681f3ba517
- Create user/ - User guides and configuration documentation - Create features/ - Feature specifications and business flows - Create debugging/ - Debug guides and quick references - Create testing/ - Test infrastructure, reports, and plans - Create internal/ - Internal plans, analyses, and templates - Move cleaner/*.md to cleaner/ directory - Move LOGGING_*.md to developer/guides/ Add docs/README.md as documentation index with category navigation and quick lookup guide. The reorganized structure makes it easier for users and developers to quickly locate relevant documentation.
655 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
655 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
# ERPAuto 测试实现审查报告
|
||
|
||
**审查日期**: 2026 年 4 月 4 日
|
||
**审查范围**: 单元测试、集成测试、E2E 测试
|
||
**审查人**: Sisyphus AI Agent
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📊 执行摘要
|
||
|
||
### 测试架构概览
|
||
|
||
| 维度 | 详情 |
|
||
| ---------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
|
||
| **测试框架** | Vitest 4.0.18 + Playwright Test 1.58.2 |
|
||
| **测试文件总数** | 44 个 (31 单元 + 7 集成 + 3 E2E + 3 调试/手动) |
|
||
| **测试用例总数** | ~300 个 |
|
||
| **当前通过率** | ~67% (约 200 通过 / 48 失败) |
|
||
| **测试覆盖率** | 未配置阈值 |
|
||
|
||
### 测试结果摘要
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
✅ 通过测试：~200 个
|
||
❌ 失败套件：20 个
|
||
❌ 失败用例：28 个
|
||
⚠️ 空测试文件：17 个
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📁 测试文件组织
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
tests/
|
||
├── setup.ts # 全局 Setup (Electron Mock)
|
||
├── fixtures/
|
||
│ ├── create-fixtures.ts # Excel 测试数据生成器
|
||
│ ├── test-export.xlsx # 生成的测试数据
|
||
│ └── test-empty-orders.xlsx # 空数据夹具
|
||
├── unit/ # 31 个单元测试文件
|
||
│ ├── services/
|
||
│ │ ├── erp/ # ERP 服务测试
|
||
│ │ │ ├── page-diagnostics.test.ts
|
||
│ │ │ └── erp-error-context.test.ts
|
||
│ │ └── logger/
|
||
│ │ └── error-utils.test.ts # ✅ 优秀测试示例
|
||
│ ├── errors.test.ts # ✅ 错误类型测试
|
||
│ ├── request-context.test.ts # ✅ 请求上下文测试 (432 行)
|
||
│ ├── schemas.test.ts # ✅ Zod Schema 验证
|
||
│ ├── repositories.test.ts # ❌ 数据库 Repository 测试 (失败)
|
||
│ ├── mysql.test.ts # ❌ MySQL 单元测试 (失败)
|
||
│ ├── sql-server.test.ts # ❌ SQL Server 测试 (失败)
|
||
│ ├── extractor.test.ts # ❌ 提取器测试 (失败)
|
||
│ ├── cleaner*.test.ts # ❌ 清理器测试 (3 个文件，失败)
|
||
│ ├── update-*.test.ts # ❌ 更新服务测试 (5 个文件，部分失败)
|
||
│ ├── logger*.test.ts # ❌ Logger 测试 (3 个文件，部分失败)
|
||
│ ├── auth-handler.test.ts # ✅ IPC Handler 测试
|
||
│ ├── excel-parser.test.ts # ❌ Excel 解析测试 (失败)
|
||
│ ├── use-*.test.ts # ✅ React Hooks 测试 (2 个文件)
|
||
│ └── ... # 其他服务测试
|
||
├── integration/ # 7 个集成测试文件
|
||
│ ├── cleaner.test.ts # ❌ 真实 ERP 集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ ├── extractor.test.ts # ❌ 提取器集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ ├── erp-auth.test.ts # ❌ 认证集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ ├── mysql.test.ts # ❌ MySQL 集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ ├── sql-server.test.ts # ❌ SQL Server 集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ ├── ipc-logging.test.ts # ❌ IPC 日志集成 (0 测试)
|
||
│ └── logger-performance.test.ts # ✅ 日志性能测试 (24 测试)
|
||
├── e2e/ # 3 个 E2E 测试文件
|
||
│ ├── auth-flow.test.ts # 登录/登出流程
|
||
│ ├── dialog-focus.test.ts # 对话框焦点管理
|
||
│ └── extractor-workflow.test.ts # 完整提取工作流
|
||
├── debug/ # 调试测试
|
||
│ └── env.test.ts # 环境变量测试 (1 失败)
|
||
└── manual/ # 手动测试脚本
|
||
├── excel-parser-test.ts # Excel 解析手动测试
|
||
└── ... # 临时调试脚本
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🐛 关键问题诊断
|
||
|
||
### P0 - 严重问题 (导致 20 个套件失败)
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 1: Electron Mock 不完整
|
||
|
||
**文件**: `tests/setup.ts`
|
||
|
||
**当前 Mock**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
vi.mock('electron', () => ({
|
||
app: {
|
||
isPackaged: false,
|
||
isReady: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
|
||
getPath: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(path.join(process.cwd(), 'logs')),
|
||
on: vi.fn()
|
||
}
|
||
}))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**缺失方法**:
|
||
|
||
- `getVersion()` - 导致 20 个套件失败
|
||
- `getName()`
|
||
- `getAppPath()`
|
||
- `getVersion()` 在以下位置被调用:
|
||
- `src/main/services/logger/index.ts:220`
|
||
- `src/main/services/erp/cleaner.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/erp/extractor.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/erp/erp-auth.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/database/mysql.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/database/sql-server.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/ipc/file-handler.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/ipc/logger-handler.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/excel/excel-parser.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/config/config-manager.ts`
|
||
- `src/main/services/update/*.ts`
|
||
|
||
**影响范围**: 所有导入 logger 或依赖 Electron app API 的模块
|
||
|
||
**修复方案**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
vi.mock('electron', () => ({
|
||
app: {
|
||
isPackaged: false,
|
||
isReady: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(false),
|
||
getPath: vi.fn().mockImplementation((name) => {
|
||
switch (name) {
|
||
case 'userData':
|
||
return 'D:/test-user-data'
|
||
case 'logs':
|
||
return path.join(process.cwd(), 'test-logs')
|
||
default:
|
||
return '/tmp'
|
||
}
|
||
}),
|
||
getVersion: vi.fn(() => '1.9.0-test'),
|
||
getName: vi.fn(() => 'ERPAuto'),
|
||
getAppPath: vi.fn(() => '/tmp/erpauto'),
|
||
on: vi.fn(),
|
||
isDefaultProtocolClient: vi.fn(() => true)
|
||
},
|
||
ipcMain: {
|
||
handle: vi.fn(),
|
||
on: vi.fn(),
|
||
removeHandler: vi.fn(),
|
||
removeListener: vi.fn()
|
||
},
|
||
dialog: {
|
||
showErrorBox: vi.fn(),
|
||
showMessageBox: vi.fn()
|
||
},
|
||
BrowserWindow: {
|
||
getAllWindows: vi.fn(() => []),
|
||
fromWebContents: vi.fn(() => null)
|
||
}
|
||
}))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 2: Winston Logger Mock 不完整
|
||
|
||
**文件**: `tests/unit/logger.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**问题代码**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
const formatFn = vi.fn((fn: any) => fn && fn()) as any
|
||
formatFn.combine = vi.fn((...args) => args)
|
||
formatFn.timestamp = vi.fn(() => ({ type: 'timestamp' }))
|
||
formatFn.colorize = vi.fn(() => ({ type: 'colorize' }))
|
||
formatFn.printf = vi.fn((fn: any) => fn)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**问题**: `format().combine().timestamp().printf()` 链式调用失败
|
||
|
||
**修复方案**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
const createFormatFn = () => {
|
||
const formatFn = vi.fn((fn) => fn) as any
|
||
formatFn.combine = vi.fn((...args) => createFormatFn())
|
||
formatFn.timestamp = vi.fn(() => createFormatFn())
|
||
formatFn.colorize = vi.fn(() => createFormatFn())
|
||
formatFn.printf = vi.fn((fn) => fn)
|
||
formatFn.json = vi.fn(() => createFormatFn())
|
||
formatFn.errors = vi.fn(() => createFormatFn())
|
||
return formatFn
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const format = createFormatFn()
|
||
|
||
vi.mock('winston', () => ({
|
||
default: {
|
||
format,
|
||
createLogger: vi.fn(() => createLoggerInstance),
|
||
transports: {
|
||
Console: vi.fn(),
|
||
DailyRotateFile: vi.fn()
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}))
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### P1 - 高优先级问题
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 3: 环境变量测试失败
|
||
|
||
**文件**: `tests/debug/env.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**失败原因**: `.env` 文件缺少 ERP 凭据配置
|
||
|
||
**当前状态**:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
process.cwd(): D:\FileLib\Projects\CodeMigration\ERPAuto
|
||
ERP_URL: (NOT SET)
|
||
ERP_USERNAME: (NOT SET)
|
||
ERP_PASSWORD: (NOT SET)
|
||
Has Credentials: false
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**修复方案**: 创建 `tests/.env.test` 文件
|
||
|
||
```env
|
||
# Test Environment Configuration
|
||
ERP_URL=https://erp-test.example.com
|
||
ERP_USERNAME=test_user
|
||
ERP_PASSWORD=test_password
|
||
|
||
# Database Test Configuration
|
||
MYSQL_HOST=localhost
|
||
MYSQL_PORT=3306
|
||
MYSQL_DATABASE=erpauto_test
|
||
MYSQL_USERNAME=test
|
||
MYSQL_PASSWORD=test
|
||
|
||
SQLSERVER_SERVER=localhost
|
||
SQLSERVER_PORT=1433
|
||
SQLSERVER_DATABASE=erpauto_test
|
||
SQLSERVER_USERNAME=test
|
||
SQLSERVER_PASSWORD=test
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 4: 空测试文件 (17 个)
|
||
|
||
**单元测试 (8 个)**:
|
||
|
||
- `tests/unit/cleaner.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/extractor.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/excel-parser.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/mysql.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/sql-server.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/data-importer.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/ipc-index.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/file-ipc-paths.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**集成测试 (6 个)**:
|
||
|
||
- `tests/integration/cleaner.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/integration/extractor.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/integration/erp-auth.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/integration/mysql.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/integration/sql-server.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/integration/ipc-logging.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**其他 (3 个)**:
|
||
|
||
- `tests/unit/update-catalog-service.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/update-installer.test.ts`
|
||
- `tests/unit/production-input-service.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**影响**: 测试覆盖率为 0%，这些模块无自动化测试保护
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 5: E2E 测试覆盖不足
|
||
|
||
**当前状态**: 仅 3 个 E2E 测试文件
|
||
|
||
- `auth-flow.test.ts` - 登录流程
|
||
- `dialog-focus.test.ts` - 对话框焦点
|
||
- `extractor-workflow.test.ts` - 提取工作流
|
||
|
||
**缺失覆盖**:
|
||
|
||
- 物料清理工作流
|
||
- 配置管理
|
||
- 用户管理
|
||
- 错误处理流程
|
||
- 更新功能
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### P2 - 中等优先级问题
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 6: 错误处理函数行为变更
|
||
|
||
**文件**: `tests/unit/errors.test.ts`
|
||
|
||
**失败测试**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
it('getErrorMessage should handle unknown types', () => {
|
||
expect(getErrorMessage('string error')).toBe('string error')
|
||
// 失败：实际返回 'An unknown error occurred'
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**根因**: `getErrorMessage` 实现逻辑变更，测试未同步更新
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### 问题 7: 缺少测试数据工厂
|
||
|
||
**当前状态**: 测试数据分散在各测试文件中
|
||
|
||
- 无中央测试数据工厂
|
||
- 重复的测试数据创建逻辑
|
||
- 测试数据一致性难以保证
|
||
|
||
**建议**: 创建 `tests/fixtures/factories.ts`
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
export function createMockUser(overrides = {}) {
|
||
return {
|
||
id: 'user-' + Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9),
|
||
username: 'test_user',
|
||
role: 'User',
|
||
...overrides
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
export function createMockOrder(overrides = {}) {
|
||
return {
|
||
orderNumber: 'ORD-' + Date.now(),
|
||
materialCodes: ['MAT-001', 'MAT-002'],
|
||
...overrides
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ✅ 优秀测试实践
|
||
|
||
### 1. Request Context 测试 (request-context.test.ts)
|
||
|
||
**特点**:
|
||
|
||
- 432 行完整的 AsyncLocalStorage 测试
|
||
- 覆盖所有边界情况
|
||
- 良好的测试分组和命名
|
||
- 包含并发请求隔离测试
|
||
|
||
**值得学习**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
describe('Concurrent Request Isolation', () => {
|
||
it('should maintain separate contexts for concurrent requests', async () => {
|
||
const request1Ids: (string | undefined)[] = []
|
||
const request2Ids: (string | undefined)[] = []
|
||
|
||
const promise1 = run(
|
||
async () => {
|
||
request1Ids.push(getRequestId())
|
||
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 10))
|
||
request1Ids.push(getRequestId())
|
||
},
|
||
{ userId: 'user-1', operation: 'extract' }
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
const promise2 = run(
|
||
async () => {
|
||
request2Ids.push(getRequestId())
|
||
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 5))
|
||
request2Ids.push(getRequestId())
|
||
},
|
||
{ userId: 'user-2', operation: 'clean' }
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
await Promise.all([promise1, promise2])
|
||
|
||
// 验证隔离性
|
||
expect(request1Ids[0]).not.toBe(request2Ids[0])
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2. Error Utils 测试 (error-utils.test.ts)
|
||
|
||
**特点**:
|
||
|
||
- 561 行完整的错误处理测试
|
||
- 覆盖序列化、清理、格式化
|
||
- 包含 requestId 自动注入测试
|
||
- 良好的 backward compatibility 测试
|
||
|
||
**值得学习**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
describe('sanitizeError', () => {
|
||
it('should sanitize custom properties by key name pattern', () => {
|
||
const error: SerializedError = {
|
||
name: 'ConfigError',
|
||
message: 'Config failed',
|
||
password: 'secret123',
|
||
secretKey: 'my-secret'
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const sanitized = sanitizeError(error)
|
||
|
||
expect(sanitized.password).toBe('[REDACTED]')
|
||
expect(sanitized.secretKey).toBe('[REDACTED]')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 3. 集成测试可用性检查模式
|
||
|
||
**特点**: 优雅处理外部依赖缺失
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
const hasCredentials = !!(config.url && config.username && config.password)
|
||
|
||
beforeAll(() => {
|
||
if (!hasCredentials) {
|
||
console.warn('Skipping ERP auth tests: credentials not configured')
|
||
return
|
||
}
|
||
authService = new ErpAuthService(config)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('should login successfully', async () => {
|
||
if (!hasCredentials) {
|
||
console.warn('Skipping test: ERP credentials not configured')
|
||
return
|
||
}
|
||
const session = await authService.login()
|
||
expect(session.isLoggedIn).toBe(true)
|
||
}, 30000)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📈 测试质量评估
|
||
|
||
### 测试覆盖率分析
|
||
|
||
| 模块类型 | 文件数 | 有测试 | 测试质量 | 覆盖率估计 |
|
||
| --------------- | ------ | ------ | -------- | ---------- |
|
||
| **服务层** | ~15 | 8 | 中 | ~40% |
|
||
| **数据库** | 4 | 0 | 无 | 0% |
|
||
| **IPC** | ~10 | 2 | 中 | ~20% |
|
||
| **工具类** | ~8 | 6 | 高 | ~80% |
|
||
| **React Hooks** | ~5 | 2 | 中 | ~40% |
|
||
| **E2E 场景** | N/A | 3 | 中 | ~15% |
|
||
|
||
### 测试健康状况
|
||
|
||
| 指标 | 状态 | 目标 |
|
||
| ----------- | ------ | ---- |
|
||
| 套件通过率 | 55% | 100% |
|
||
| 用例通过率 | 67% | 95%+ |
|
||
| 空测试文件 | 17 个 | 0 个 |
|
||
| Mock 完整性 | 中 | 高 |
|
||
| E2E 覆盖 | 低 | 中 |
|
||
| 覆盖率阈值 | 无配置 | 70%+ |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎯 改进计划
|
||
|
||
改进计划详情请参阅：[docs/test-improvement-plan.md](./test-improvement-plan.md)
|
||
|
||
### 阶段 1: 立即修复 (第 1-2 周) - P0
|
||
|
||
| 任务 | 描述 | 预计工时 | 成功标准 |
|
||
| ---- | ------------------ | -------- | ------------------- |
|
||
| 1.1 | 完成 Electron Mock | 2h | 20 个套件全部通过 |
|
||
| 1.2 | 修复 Winston Mock | 2h | Logger 测试全部通过 |
|
||
| 1.3 | 创建测试环境配置 | 1h | 环境测试通过 |
|
||
|
||
**预期结果**: 消除全部 48 个失败，通过率提升至 100%
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 阶段 2: 短期改进 (第 3-6 周) - P1
|
||
|
||
| 任务 | 描述 | 预计工时 | 成功标准 |
|
||
| ---- | ----------------------- | -------- | ----------------- |
|
||
| 2.1 | 填充单元测试 (8 个文件) | 16h | 新增 50+ 测试用例 |
|
||
| 2.2 | 完成集成测试 (6 个文件) | 12h | 新增 30+ 测试用例 |
|
||
| 2.3 | 修复 28 个现有失败用例 | 8h | 用例通过率 100% |
|
||
|
||
**预期结果**: 测试用例总数达 380+，关键模块覆盖率达 80%
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 阶段 3: 中期目标 (第 2-3 月) - P2
|
||
|
||
| 任务 | 描述 | 预计工时 | 成功标准 |
|
||
| ---- | ------------------------ | -------- | ------------------ |
|
||
| 3.1 | E2E 覆盖扩展至 12 个文件 | 20h | 50+ E2E 测试用例 |
|
||
| 3.2 | 创建测试数据工厂 | 8h | 统一测试数据创建 |
|
||
| 3.3 | 测试覆盖率阈值配置 | 4h | 70% 全局，80% 关键 |
|
||
|
||
**预期结果**: E2E 覆盖关键用户旅程，覆盖率达标
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 阶段 4: 长期战略 (第 4-6 月) - P3
|
||
|
||
| 任务 | 描述 | 预计工时 | 成功标准 |
|
||
| ---- | ---------------------- | -------- | --------------- |
|
||
| 4.1 | GitHub Actions CI 集成 | 8h | PR 自动运行测试 |
|
||
| 4.2 | 测试健康监控仪表板 | 12h | 实时覆盖率追踪 |
|
||
| 4.3 | 变异测试试点 | 16h | 测试质量提升 |
|
||
|
||
**预期结果**: 完整的 CI/CD 测试流水线，自动化测试文化
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📋 行动项清单
|
||
|
||
### 立即执行 (本周)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] 更新 `tests/setup.ts` 添加完整 Electron Mock
|
||
- [ ] 修复 `tests/unit/logger.test.ts` Winston Mock
|
||
- [ ] 创建 `tests/.env.test` 测试环境配置
|
||
- [ ] 运行 `npm run test:run` 验证修复效果
|
||
|
||
### 短期执行 (本月)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] 为 8 个空单元测试文件添加测试
|
||
- [ ] 为 6 个空集成测试文件添加测试
|
||
- [ ] 创建 `tests/fixtures/factories.ts` 测试数据工厂
|
||
- [ ] 修复所有失败的测试用例
|
||
|
||
### 中期执行 (本季度)
|
||
|
||
- [ ] 扩展 E2E 测试至 12 个文件
|
||
- [ ] 配置 vitest 覆盖率阈值
|
||
- [ ] 建立测试审查流程
|
||
- [ ] 编写测试最佳实践文档
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📚 附录
|
||
|
||
### A. 测试运行命令
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# 全量测试
|
||
npm run test:run
|
||
|
||
# 带覆盖率测试
|
||
npm run test:coverage
|
||
|
||
# 单次运行特定文件
|
||
npx vitest run tests/unit/request-context.test.ts
|
||
|
||
# 监听模式
|
||
npm run test
|
||
|
||
# E2E 测试
|
||
npm run test:e2e
|
||
|
||
# E2E 报告
|
||
npm run test:e2e:report
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### B. 关键文件参考
|
||
|
||
| 文件 | 用途 |
|
||
| ----------------------------------- | ---------------- |
|
||
| `vitest.config.ts` | Vitest 配置 |
|
||
| `playwright.config.ts` | Playwright 配置 |
|
||
| `tests/setup.ts` | 全局 Setup/Mocks |
|
||
| `tests/fixtures/create-fixtures.ts` | 测试数据生成 |
|
||
|
||
### C. 测试模式参考
|
||
|
||
**单元测试模板**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach, vi } from 'vitest'
|
||
|
||
describe('ServiceName', () => {
|
||
let service: ServiceClass
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
service = new ServiceClass(config)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
afterEach(() => {
|
||
vi.restoreAllMocks()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
describe('methodName', () => {
|
||
it('should do something', async () => {
|
||
const result = await service.methodName()
|
||
expect(result).toBeDefined()
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**集成测试模板**:
|
||
|
||
```typescript
|
||
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'vitest'
|
||
|
||
const hasCredentials = !!process.env.TEST_DB_HOST
|
||
|
||
describe('DatabaseService Integration', () => {
|
||
let service: DatabaseService
|
||
|
||
beforeAll(async () => {
|
||
if (!hasCredentials) {
|
||
console.warn('Skipping: DB credentials not configured')
|
||
return
|
||
}
|
||
service = new DatabaseService(testConfig)
|
||
await service.connect()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
afterAll(async () => {
|
||
if (service) await service.disconnect()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it.skipIf(!hasCredentials)('should connect to database', async () => {
|
||
expect(service.isConnected()).toBe(true)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**审查结论**: 项目测试基础良好，但存在关键 Mock 不完整和覆盖率缺口问题。建议优先修复 P0/P1 问题，然后系统性扩展测试覆盖。
|